You are here
Home > FEATURES > Will the Urus become more successful than its spiritual predecessor?

Will the Urus become more successful than its spiritual predecessor?

The Lamborghini Urus was unveiled in 2017, five years after the Italian carmaker unveiled its first SUV in the form of a concept car. But even though it’s Lambo’s first SUV, the Urus isn’t the first utility vehicle coming from Sant’Agata Bolognese. Lamborghini began meddling with the idea all the way back in 1977 and launched its first production model in 1986 as the LM002. That’s a few good years before AM General introduced the iconic Hummer H1 for civilian use in 1992.

In many ways, the LM002 is the spiritual successor of the Urus, but the two utility vehicles are actually very different. They were conceived for different purposes, have radically different designs, and deliver different performance figures. With the modern SUV now official and on its way to showrooms, we take a look back at Lambo’s history with utility vehicles and the iconic LM002. How does the Urus compare to Lambo’s first venture into this market and what sets the two SUVs apart? Find out below.

8 thoughts on “Will the Urus become more successful than its spiritual predecessor?

  1. Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well written article. I will make sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely comeback.

  2. Hey this is kinda of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding knowledge so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  3. Hi there! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my good old room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!

  4. In this grand pattern of things you get an A just for hard work. Where exactly you actually lost us was first on the facts. As it is said, details make or break the argument.. And that couldn’t be more true in this article. Having said that, let me tell you just what did give good results. The authoring is certainly incredibly convincing which is possibly why I am taking an effort to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, while I can easily see the leaps in logic you come up with, I am not really convinced of exactly how you appear to unite your points that produce the conclusion. For the moment I shall yield to your point but trust in the foreseeable future you connect your dots better.

Leave a Reply